Friday, August 18, 2006

I don't know a lot about Barak Obama, but from the article (here) on his upcoming trip to Kenya and other African countries, I like what I see. I'm sure there's a lot of things in him I would disagree with as well, as with most politicians, but these points resonate with me:

"One of the messages I’m going to send is that, ultimately, Africa is responsible for helping itself,'' Mr Obama said in an interview yesterday.

I believe that while the foreign community can and should help with the problems in Africa, ultimately it will be up to Africa to make the changes necessary to bring itself into the 21st century.

Earlier this year, Mr Obama attached an amendment to a pending Bill that would provide up to $52 million (Sh3.7 billion) to the Congo while letting President George W. Bush withdraw the assistance if the country makes insufficient progress toward democracy.

I've quoted Sachs here many times, and in Belgium I talked with a man who claimed to be a good friend of "Jeffrey," but one of the things I like most about his book is that if countries are not willing to take steps to end corruption and work for the good of their people, then the West has the right, the mandate, to drop its funding and support. Let's give where the work will be used properly.

He also plans to talk about the responsibility of Africans to take action against "a lack of basic rule of law and accountability that has hampered the ability of countries with enormous natural resources,'' according to an earlier interview. (AP)

Every day I was in Kenya the front page of the Daily Nation centered around corruption in the highest levels of government and how much that cost the people. They need to get beyond that. Supposedly this government is doing better, but its hard to undo what 27 years of corrupt rule built up. It'll be interesting to watch how the Kenyans react as time goes on, it is very easy to go along with the tide, but it'll start with one who says no to corruption and sets the standard while the domino effect takes place. They can then shame those who are still partaking and run the nation as it deserves to be run.

6 comments:

edluv said...

although i understand attaching stipulations to funding, and probably support it, when did democracy become the standard? and does it not apply when dealing with the middle east? because we sure send them plenty of our dollars without caring that the spit on democracy daily.

and although i enjoy and appreciate democracy, i also realize that it is no more Biblically endorsed than a dictatorship.

sorry, i realize this sounds very angry or aggressive. not my point. i do think we need to work for justice, end corruption, and insure that the aid goes to people that need it, but what does working towards democracy mean? and, what happens when a country elects someone we don't agree with (see venezuela)? do we cut the funds if they elect a socailist that we don't get along with?

JPN said...

Agreed man, and I appreciate the passion! Democracy is not the ideal for all people groups, what I do like is that a nation needs to be making steps toward bettering intself and coming into the 21st century before we are going to hand money over to them.

I don't know a lot of about Chavez, heard both good and bad, mostly good lately, where could I get some more info on him?

Thanks for checking in.

edluv said...

it's hard to find accurate coverage, in my opinion, about chavez. most of the u.s. media seems to take the standpoint that he's loony (and he's got a touch of that maybe) or that he's evil, or some other slight. basically, most follow our gov't standpoint.

if you go to outsider sources, like indymedia.net or guerilla news network, you see the totally opposite viewpoint. there he's the david standing up to the evil bush goliath.

i'm not saying that either perspective is right. i do respect him for challenging the norms, and for trying to help his country. of course, some would say he's screwing his country through his socialist leaning economic policies.

i try and check out several sites for news and process what they're all saying about stuff. but i do admit i like the bbc's site, and think they try and do a fair job reporting what's going on across the world.

JPN said...

I'm sure it's somewhere in the middle, I don't think the US is as evil as the world portrays us, but I don't think we are as good as we think we are either.

I do also agree that his economic policies would worry me, where has this worked? Anywhere?

edluv said...

which of his policies? standing up to the u.s.? claiming the oil interests for his country instead of big u.s. business?

both of these policies rarely work. in fact, they tend to get you invaded. for democracy's sake of course.

JPN said...

Socialism.