Thursday, April 27, 2006

Two things stick out to me in the article below. First, there are two major fallacies here, first an appeal to pity on the part of the young lady (which I share, but it gets us off of the topic) and an ad hominem attack against Congress (which again may be right but it gets us off of the topic, people who are in our country illegally)
.
Second, I don't ever see the US deporting people who, though they came here illegally, have lived an upright life. All I want (and I'm sure many others) are those who use the system and commit the crimes (whether that be 1 or 10 million) be punished and returned.

Diana Villanueva-Hoeckley did not take the typical path to Westmont College, a Christian liberal arts college in Montecito, California. The 19-year-old sophomore was born in Guatemala, and then smuggled into the United States at the age of 7. Her story makes you want to cry. What the U.S. Congress may do to her makes you want to scream.

Diana's mother came to the United States legally in the mid-1990s. Once she had established some semblance of a life for herself in the Los Angeles area, she tried to obtain a visa for her daughter to come and live with her. The U.S. Embassy turned down her application. Desperate to have her daughter by her side, she paid a "coyote," or migrant smuggler, to deliver Diana to California.


Imagine the fright of being told at age 7 that you must take a long, covert journey with a stranger, all alone. Diana today can only recall snippets: a bus journey, a short plane ride, hanging out at borders waiting for the right moment to cross. "I just kept focused on how great it would be together with my mother again," says Diana.


Not long after her arrival into the U.S., Diana and her now-pregnant mother moved to Santa Barbara. Diana's sister, Estrellita, was born. Earning a meager income from a string of housecleaning jobs, her mother moved the family into a small trailer. Diana attended public schools in the Santa Barbara area starting in the third grade.


During her freshman year in high school, Diana took note that her mother was not looking well. Lacking health insurance, her mother visited a health clinic serving a low-income population. At first she was diagnosed with pneumonia, but slowly it became apparent that something much more serious was going on. She had lung cancer, and died within two years.
Chris Hoeckley and Cheri Larsen Hoeckley are both professors at Westmont College. Their daughter, Mackenzie, was Estrellita's classmate at the local public school. Many there were heartbroken by Diana and Estrellita's loss. The Hoeckleys reached out and embraced the girls into their family.


The Hoeckleys had for some time looked to adoption as an avenue for growing their family. Their desire to parent matched their religious conviction that God calls us to care for the orphans in need. They went through the county process to legally adopt the Villanueva children. In the midst of much tragedy, the Hoeckleys, now 5 in number, patched together a loving connection.


If only the story could move on from there to focus on the life experiences that all families look to create. But most families do not face criminal prosecution. Yet, Diana may one day soon be charged as a felon for illegally immigrating to this country 13 years ago. And her adoptive parents also could be criminally charged for aiding and abetting an illegal immigrant.

7 comments:

edluv said...

is that the whole article? it seems to end abruptly, in my opinion.

sadly, "I don't ever see the US deporting people who, though they came here illegally, have lived an upright life" this happens all the time. most every person that comes here illegally lives an upright life, working day to day, paying rent, buying groceries, driving to work. if any are doing something illegally, it's probably driving without a license and insurance. of course, they can't get one of those, so they're forced to continue to break the law.

but really, i have met a girl that went to my college (not westmont but another Xian liberal arts univ in ca.) that was here illegally. she had been here all but the very first years of her life. had been an honors student in h.s. was excelling in college. and, her and her family had been trying to get legalized most of the time they had been here. but, last summer, she was on the verge of being deported. i don't know how the case ended up.

i currently know another student, who is one of the greatest kids i've ever met, and he is here illegally. this kid is sensitive, respects authorities, works hard, and will go somewhere in life. but, he lives with the reality that he & family could be sent elsewhere if the government catches up with them.

i hear what you're saying, about just wanting to send criminals back. of course, this is something we've been doing. this very thing helped to start the gang ms13, one of the most violent gangs currently spreading across the nation.

but, the proposal in the senate, which is now completely different, did make it a felony to aid an illegal immigrant in any way. so, any church that gave food, clothes, the love of Christ, would have been committing a felony.

JPN said...

Of course, I should have mentioned I put very little confidence in our gov to get the job done right.

As mentioned, I still have a problem with people being here illegally. Good or bad, and that probably means we have to change some of the laws. Do we just let all people in who want to come here?

I don't know, but is there another country who just allows people who are there illegally to stay?

Adam Nate said...

Gotta plug myself here:

http://adamnate.blogspot.com/2006/04/note-to-usa-learn-from-mexico.html

“There are two separate issues in the current debate on ILLEGAL immigration.

There first is the border issue. How do we keep alien invaders from essentially committing an act of war and entering our sovereign nation ILLEGALLY. That part is easy. We build a wall from the beautiful beaches of San Diego to the Gulf of Mexico. I don’t want to hear it can’t be done. Of course it can be done.

Now, will it be done? Of course not!

The second issue deals with what to do with those ILLEGAL aliens who are already living in this country ILLEGALLY. These people have broken our nation’s laws. If being a nation founded on the rule of law means anything, then we cannot allow this contravention to go unpunished. So, let’s find all those living here illegally and deal with them. In some cases this will mean a fine to both them and their employer along with being placed on a path working toward their citizenship. But in MANY cases this will mean deportation.

Will any of this happen? Of course not. Both sides are firmly entrenched and basically want either full amnesty and an open border or a wall along with kicking down doors dragging people who have been here for years across the border. The best legislation would begin with a wall to keep new invaders out and then create some sort of worker program ending in citizenship for those already here – after they have paid their debt to society for breaking the law.” - Adam Nate

JPN said...

I see I've caused quite a stir, let me add a few points:

1) I continue to read in the Old and New Testament the need for protect and care for the alien, fatherless, widom, poor, etc. It is clearly a biblical mandate.

2) That being said, I have no problem with those who come to the US legally. And I know that may be difficult, and it pains me when I see those arriving on the boat from Cuba sent back (if you ever want to read a great true story of one man's life in Cuba under Castro, read "Against All Hope" by Armanda Valladares, great read!), so I am somewhat for an open border system. What I am not for is a free-for-all where anyone comes and goes and those who are here illegally take to the streets and protest for their right to be here, when by our laws they don't have the right. Could they, yes, do they at the moment, no. I agree with Adam above, "The best legislation would begin with a wall to keep new invaders out and then create some sort of worker program ending in citizenship for those already here - after they have paid their debt to society for breaking the law."

JPN said...

I should also mention, Ed, that your friends and the story I referenced in one of the girl, Diana, should be able to stay. Again, I don't know the exact details of the laws, but they need to stay and become full-fledged citizens, even if they have to pay a debt to society for breaking the law.

Adam Nate said...

Sup JP?!

You touch on something incredibly key here, and that is the double standard of ILLEGAL immigration. And yes, I will continue to use all caps with that word. The debate here is not one of immigration. It is one of ILLEGAL immigration vs. legal immigration.

One of my questions is why do ILLEGAL immigrants from Mexico get a free pass? What does that say about our country? What are we saying to the millions of impoverished men, women, and children from places who don’t happen to live in a country that shares a border with the U.S.? What does an acceptance of ILLEGAL immigrants from Mexico who audaciously shake their fists at the laws of our land (no need to document that given the on-going events we are all witnessing) say to people from Cambodia, Guatemala, and the Sudan, who patiently linger for years trying to enter our land legally? We make them wait, yet we leave an open border for Mexicans to flock across. I would be interested if someone could show me how that is just. Such a double standard makes a charade of orderly, and more importantly, legal migration procedures.

JPN said...

I think that is a good point and one I had overlooked. My good friend Timothy from Kenya had waited for years to get a visa to come to the US to join his wife who was studying and working. Why couldn't he come? Why did his family have to be split during that time? Why not buy a ticket to Mexico and come in across the border to join his family? Who would blame him? Fortunately for him, he finally got the visa and his family rejoined.

I know a lot more people in Kenya who need access to the opportunity the US offers than those south of the border.