Saturday, May 13, 2006

John Stossel came out with a new book this past week (Myth's, Lies, and Downright Stupidity) and dedicated last night's "20/20" show to the top ten myths the public buys into. The number one myth was that more foreign aid to Africa will help pull them out of poverty. He interviewed Jeffrey Sachs, considered the foremost expert on the third world economies and what needs to be done to improve them (and whose book I've read and commented on much in the past year). Stossel noted that we've spent half a trillion dollars in the past thirty years on aid to Africa and as a whole, they've gotten poorer. Sachs said that is ludicrous, we need to give more.

My take: Both men are right and both men are wrong. Stossel is right in that most of the aid we have given has gone into the hands of the corrupt government officials and immediately made its way to foreign banks (mostly European). He is wrong in that more aid is needed, and if done right, will not be wasted.

Sachs (along with Bono) is wrong in his being adamant that the West needs to give more aid to soothe our conscience and that we continue to go through the corrupt government systems. He is right that more aid can and will make a major difference in the developing world.

I've stated my solution many times, here is another summary: More aid is needed to pull the poorest of the poor up to the first rung of the economic ladder. The developing world governments also play a role, they need to open up the markets and rid themselves of corruption (which the cynic in me says will never happen). Grass-roots (mostly faith-based) organizations need to continue to get involved and help the people they can help. If it is a village here, a community there, a slum here, whatever, every little bit helps, all we can give us what we've been given, we are only required to be faithful with that.

10 comments:

Anonymous said...

Jason,

Have you ever read "Atlas Shrugged"?

I'd be interested in your perspective on the role of government, belief, business, and responsibility with resources after you read it.

The 1991 Library of Congress said it was the second most influential book ever written. Polls with CEO's consistently rank it as the second best resource.

The first in both cases was the same: The Bible.

Adam Nate said...

Interesting. Wish I could have caught that interview. Stossel is one of the few guys out there who is willing to ask the hard questions and really challenge people, regardless of their political persuasion. BTW JP, I still have your copy of "Give Me A Break." Probably should return that pretty soon :-) What's it been, like a year?

Great book recommendation John. The impact of both books – God’s Word and Atlas Shrugged – in America cannot be overstated. I’m sure most readers of this blog would rightly disagree with Ayn Rand’s atheistic/agnostic stand and would be disgusted at the many negative things she had to say about followers of Jesus Christ. But along with the many bones within Rand’s philosophy that should be spit out, I think there is also an awful lot of meat. Pastor-theologian John Piper said it well:

“In my judgment, Ayn Rand is a very important intellectual voice in America today and must be seriously reckoned with if for no other reason than the wide readership her novels continue to receive. But there are other reasons. Since first reading Atlas Shrugged and especially the speech of John Galt, which Rand says is the briefest summary of her philosophy, I have been continually provoked to deeper and clearer perception and thought. I do not share the undifferentiated condemnations against her fiction, which is the most enthralling I have ever read, or her philosophy, which as O'Neill says is at least ‘refreshingly abrasive.’ But even more, Ayn Rand is right on some fundamental issues.”

What would Rand say about government aid to Africa? “No way Jose!” – for many good reasons.

She would likely also be agreement with George Mason University economics professor Walter Williams:

“What African countries need, the West cannot give. In a word, what Africans need is personal liberty. That means a political system where there are guarantees of private property rights and rule of law. It's almost a no-brainer. The ‘2003 Index of Economic Freedom,’ published by the Heritage Foundation and The Wall Street Journal, lists Botswana, South Africa and Namibia as ‘mostly free.’ World Bank 2002 country per capita GDP rankings put Botswana 89th ($2,980), South Africa 94th ($2,600) and Namibia 111th ($1,700). Is there any mystery why they're well ahead of their northern neighbors, such as Mozambique 195th ($210), Liberia 201st ($150) or Ethiopia 206th ($100)?

The lack of liberty means something else: A nation loses its best and most mobile people first. According to the 2000 census, there were 881,300 African-born U.S. residents. They're doing well in our country, and many are professionals sorely needed back home. While in attendance at a Washington, D.C., Nigerian affair, some years ago, I listened while the Nigerian ambassador admonished the mostly Nigerian audience to come back home. At the table where I was sitting, my Nigerian hosts broke out in near uncontrollable laughter.”

If we really desire to help Africans my suggestion would be too give your money only to groups who (a) have as their primary goal the preaching of the Gospel of Jesus Christ and the discipling of those who believe and (b) engage in basic education and practical job training of nationals. Jason probably knows more of these groups than I do, but two examples I have are organizations like Gospel for Asia and International Teams. Groups such as these are far more effective than any government aid or Bonehead-sponsored concert EVER will be.

Cheers!

Anonymous said...

Adam,

We need to get together some time...

Atlas Shrugged gives a worldview for this matrix...she misses the point on justice not being confined to this matrix.

However, she essentially proves the Bible and later in life realized there had to be a God. The people who represent her today are missing the boat and have stopped short on her philosophy.

I wrote notes for the book so that people didn't have to read the 1100 page book twice to "get" it. I gave them to over 60 people. (Anyone who wants to read the book can contact me for the notes.)

Among the many things I like about the book (and most people miss): she reconstructed the Trinity (having characters that represent Jesus, God the Father, and the Holy Spirit), she recreated the scene of Jesus in the garden, she gives the best description of heaven I have ever read, and she exhaustively covers CS Lewis' three aspects of morality.

Book 1 gives every possible example of people interacting with people. Book 2 gives every possible example of people interacting within themselves. Book 3 gives every example of people interacting with their creator.

What caught my eye on this blog was the Bono comment. Paul O'Neil was a HUGE fan of Atlas Shrugged. He was the guy Bono first bonded with in the US. To try and understand Bono, et al without having read Atlas Shrugged is "unprofitable".

Anonymous said...

One more comment...

Atlas Shrugged is 3 books with 10 chapters each.

Republicans love the first 15 and don't talk about the last 15.

Democrats would love the last 15 chapters, but they can't seem to make it through the first 15 chapters.

JPN said...

Have not read the book, hope to this summer, have added it to my amazon wish list.

John, love to get together some time when you have a moment.

Adam Nate said...

Mr. John,

Adam Nate is a man of the people and is always open to good coffee and good conversation. Few quick questions and points:

Do you have any documentation that Ayn Rand “prove[d] the Bible and later in life realized there had to be a God”? I would be interested to read what you have found. I know she seemed to soften her atheism later in life and had heard once that she may have embraced agnosticism. I appreciate a lot of her ideas, but the “bones” I was referring to were beliefs like those brought out in the two quotes below:

“And now I see the face of god, and I raise this god over the earth, this god whom men have sought since men came into being, this god who will grant them joy and peace and pride. This god, this one word: ‘I.’”

“Now you want me to speak about the cross. What is correct is that I do regard the cross as the symbol of the sacrifice of the ideal to the nonideal. Isn't that what it does mean? Christ, in terms of the Christian philosophy, is the human ideal. He personifies that which men should strive to emulate. Yet, according to the Christian mythology, he died on the cross not for his own sins but for the sins of the nonideal people. [...] And it is in the name of that symbol that men are asked to sacrifice themselves for their inferiors.”

Concerning the Bono (“Bonehead”) comment, listeners of The Michael Savage Show will pick up the name change and I only brought him up to distinguish the groups who I feel are really make a lasting difference in Africa and those who, though popular and loved by the masses, are largely missing the mark. Whether Bonehead is a fan of Rand I don’t know. Simply because Paul O’Neil was a fan of Atlas Shrugged and he and Bonehead were friends, it doesn’t follow that Bono is a Rand-enthusiast. Now Bono may very well be a fan, but I don’t follow how one has to read Atlas Shrugged to understand him and his views on Africa. That seems pretty off the wall. The socialist followers of Bono probably wouldn’t be happy to hear this. I heard Bono quotes the Bible more than anything else.

And last but not least, I am tired of hearing about Democrats and Republicans. Both party’s as a whole, their leaders, and their members, make me want to vomit. To say they believe in anything besides pragmatism is a stretch in my view. Therefore to ease my sickness and to alleviate a bisel of my political cynicism, I propose we implement the “Fred Plan”:

“The solution to the conflict between the two groups should be obvious to all thinking people, if any: Drop them down an abandoned oil well, pump large amounts of potassium cyanide after them, and stuff Oprah into the hole as a plug. A cap of cement couldn’t hurt. The silence alone would justify this wise deed.”

I’ve got the cement cap. Anyone got some extra potassium cyanide in their garage they don’t need?

Anonymous said...

Senor Adam,

The Republicans have half the truth. The Democrats have half the truth. If neither of them had any truth, they wouldn't still be around. That's not to say that another group isn't closer.

I will warn you: I took the "Which party are you?" test on the internet during the last election. My scores were statistically equal between Republican, Democrat, Libretarian, and Green.

"Ayn Rand: A Sense of Life" shows an interview shortly before her death where she says she believes in God.

In my Atlas notes, I have a section where I put quotes from the Bible, Mere Christianity, and the Matrix that completely sync up with the chapter in question.

She proved justice has to eventually equal everything. Ayn Rand tried to give a worldview where justice was completed in this matrix. Obviously it isn't.

Eventually, she realized this must not be the ultimate reality and there must be a greater reality with a greater being.

The key to understanding a person's views is in understanding the "why". It is not enough to look at the actions. We humans judge the outside and this leads to error in most cases.

In order to understand Bono, you'd need to understand the "why". Atlas Shrugged certainly has "socialist" tendencies in the last 10 chapters when viewed in the Big Picture.

JPN said...

Joh, I really like this comment:

"The key to understanding a person's views is in understanding the "why". It is not enough to look at the actions. We humans judge the outside and this leads to error in most cases."

I agree that this is where we error in judging people. J.P. Moreland wrote that if we want to change someone's behaviors, we need to change their beliefs. I think he is right, though we tend to go about it the other way, seeking to change the behavior and not addressing the core beliefs.

Adam Nate said...

If that’s true about Senorita Rand, it is welcomed news. Hopefully there was also a death-bed repentance and trusting of Jesus! We’ll know soon enough I reckon.

What quiz was that you took? And John, Green?!?!?! :-)

Take this one when time allows (not much time need though – it’s called the world shortest political quiz):

http://www.theadvocates.org/quiz.html

This one is more geared toward what modern political principles you are adhere too rather than what political party you would best affiliate with. Not that such things matter all that much too me. Seem to becoming more and more apolitical as the days go on. In fact, I’m more apolitical now that before I wrote this sentence. And I’m more apolitical now than…

JPN said...

Hey John,

I've been trying to get through to you via email but keep getting rejected. Thursday or Friday morning would work for me, can you email me at jnate@new.rr.com